Kingsford Smith Drive Upgrade

The most complex and largest road project undertaken by Brisbane City Council in living memory

The Kingsford Smith Drive Upgrade is considered to be an important city-shaping project, creating an entry statement to Brisbane and transforming one of the city’s most significant routes into a vibrant urban corridor with the Brisbane River as the centrepiece. Known as “The Gateway to Brisbane”, the $650 million project constructed by Lendlease, will provide increased road capacity to accommodate future traffic volumes through widening the road from four to six lanes between Theodore Street at Eagle Farm and Cooksley Street at Hamilton. It also includes improvement works between Cooksley Street and Breakfast Creek Road at Albion and associated works to adjacent local roads.

The key community benefits of the project include:

  • Reduced traffic congestion
  • Improved safety, local amenity and access for all road users including cyclists, pedestrians and public transport users
  • Seven kilometres of cyclist and pedestrian links to the new Brett’s Wharf City Cat Ferry Terminal
  • Bretts Wharf Plaza, a new outdoor event space that connects the Racecourse Road retail precinct, The Riverwalk, Portside and Northshore Hamilton
  • A tree lined boulevard along the corridor. To create space in the median for the tree lined boulevard, a cantilever structure was built out over the river
  • River walk rest stop nodes built out into the river and provide viewing platforms, seating and shade for recreation
  • The upgrade of Cameron Rocks Reserve including the ceremonial memorial court and refurbished war memorial providing amenity for park users, including direct access to the river
  • Illuminated artwork throughout the corridor
  • Upgrades to existing bus stops
  • A new public jetty
Barbeque area – Cameron Rocks Reserve

Lendlease (LLE) were contracted by Brisbane City Council (BCC) to deliver the Kingsford Smith Drive Upgrade as a Design and Construct (D&C) Project. Lendlease appointed the Jacobs KBR Joint Venture (DJV) as lead designer for the project, supported by a range of specialist subcontractors, including the appointment of Architecture & Access (A&A) as the Equitable Access Consultant and Lat27 for Landscape and Urban Design.

We were engaged in 2016, and as this is an urban project which is one that was not governed by building code legislation, we were tasked with developing a brief specifically to assist with the design and assessment of the Kingsford Smith Drive upgrade works, and known as the Equitable Access Statement (EAS).

The EAS followed the guidance and process of the relevant Australian Standards, Building Codes where applicable and Federal legislation to achieve minimum compliance for people with disabilities from a technical aspect as a baseline. Wherever possible, enhanced outcomes were sought in line with the spirit and intent of the Disability Discrimination Act (DDA). The EAS focused on the provision of a well thought out physical, economic and social environment to enable equality, opportunity, participation and inclusion for all. The EAS informed the direction, consistency and purpose in decision making on the project, and nominated equitable access provisions to be applied to the design of the project which formed the framework to also be used to assess the project. The EAS applied to all areas requiring application of equitable access provisions including, but not limited to, areas accessible to the general public as pedestrians.

The EAS was endorsed by the Department of Communities, Child Safety and Disability Services as part of the project requirements.

Architecture & Access drew of the Brisbane City Council Access and Inclusion Plan 2012 – 2017 and the following relevant reference documents and guiding principles to form an overriding philosophy for access for people with disabilities for the project:

  • Disability Discrimination Act (1992) (Cth)
  • Australian Standards as noted in BCC Exhibit A Attachment 1 Codes and Standards – Design Standards Pedestrian and Bicycle Facilities
  • Relevant Australian Standards
  • Building Code of Australia (BCA)
  • HREOC Advisory Notes – Access to Premises
  • Disability (Access to Premises – Buildings) Standards 2010
  • Disability (Access to Premises – Buildings) Standards Guidelines 2010
  • Disability (Access to Premises – Buildings) Standards Guidelines 2013 Version 2
  • Disability Standards for Accessible Public Transport 2002
  • Disability Standards for Accessible Public Transport Guidelines 2004 Version 3
  • Brisbane City Council Access and Inclusion Plan 2012-2017

The Brisbane City Council Access and Inclusion Plan 2012-2017 provided the following principles that we incorporated into the EAS.

These principles are as follows:

  • Abilities, not disabilities;
  • Fundamental rights for all;
  • Genuine dialogue and participation;
  • Improving access and inclusion for all;
  • Judicious utilisation of resources;
  • The benefits of working across sectors; and
  • Universal design

These principles specifically relate to the project regarding the following areas of the Brisbane City Council Access and Inclusion Plan 2012-2017 and will be the main focus of this document.

  1. Pedestrian Mobility and Transport
  2. Planning, development and infrastructure
  3. Public buildings, venues and outdoor spaces

Key Access Elements considered in the EAS for this project included:

  • Pathways, crossings and road/street treatments
  • Transport infrastructure and interface
  • Street furniture and picnic facilities
  • Structures and shelters
  • Planting and parkland areas
  • Integrated and innovative public art types and opportunities
  • Interpretive and wayfinding signage
  • Functional pedestrian and road lighting
  • Dramatic and visually creative lighting design
  • Event opportunities
  • Bike ways
  • Parking and drop-off areas
  • Pontoons

The Brisbane City Council Access and Inclusion Plan 2012-2017 indicated universal design as a principle to follow in project development.

Universal design comes from a premise that we are not all the same: some of us are elderly, children, some are pregnant or use a walking stick, some are short or tall, some have use of only one arm or are just trying to carry luggage to the airport. All of these factors contribute to how we can function and use a space or product at any one time.

The term universal design was first documented in the US by architect Ronald Mace in 1985 (Vavik & Gheerawo 2009). Mace presented his definition of universal design as a consumer market driven issue, noting that the focus should not be on people with disabilities but on all people, as we all have differing abilities and that none of us are immune from ageing, frailty or disability (Centre for Universal Design 2008). He believed that no environment is ever fully universally designed as we can always make everything more useable (Centre for Universal Design 2008).

The seven principles of universal design were developed by the North Carolina State University in 1997. These have facilitated discussion and promotion of the concept of universal design.  However, there have been criticisms of these principles stating that they are not linked to scientific bodies of evidence and are not clearly measurable (Steinfeld & Maisel, 2012).  In response, eight goals of universal design have been developed that align with the original principles of universal design but draw from recognised bodies of knowledge and directly link with recognisable outcomes, such as social participation (Steinfeld & Maisel, 2012). The goals of universal design are:

  1. Body fit
  2. Comfort
  3. Awareness
  4. Understanding
  5. Health and wellness
  6. Social integration
  7. Personalisation
  8. Cultural appropriateness (Steinfeld & Maisel 2012)

As there are no clear prescriptive guidelines to achieving equitable access in the built environment, the universal design process has been chosen as the basis of the philosophy to achieving the design intent, as it closely aligns with the Disability Discrimination Act (1992) (Cth) (DDA) and the Brisbane City Council Access and Inclusion Plan 2012-2017.

The assumption is that by using the seven UD Principles and the DDA, the guiding principles of the council’s commitment to access and inclusion will also be met and hence the expectation/need of all users of the space to promote health, wellness and social participation for a wide range of people. The seven UD Principles are:

  1. Equitable to use
  2. Flexible in use
  3. Simple and intuitive to use
  4. Easy to interpret
  5. Safe and sensible
  6. Requires low physical effort
  7. Promotes size and space and approach for use

Architecture & Access has worked closely with both KSDJV and Lendlease over the last four years to achieve a well thought-out environment to enable equality, opportunity, participation and inclusion for all.

Share
Posted in Access Consulting